Is the Supreme Court stepping outside its boundaries on
cases and accepting gifts or bribes?
This past year has shown that cases of a political nature have
shown up at the Supreme Court for a ruling that produced case precedence that
can be used in lower courts. One has to wonder if these cases are being brought
forward based on political ideology so that case precedence can be secured, or
if the decisions handed down are done so by justices who have stepped of their
legal boundaries to produce said decisions? For example, the case of all the
LGBTQ+ cases being brought forward about refusal of services by wedding cake
bakers, wedding website designers, and florists who have refused services based
on religious beliefs. Each case was either shot down or in one case upheld as a creative style based on First Amendment rights of free speech because it
involved creativity, while the other cases resulted in the businesses having to
pay out large sums of money to those who brought the lawsuit against them. These cases are nothing more than someone
getting their feelings hurt because they didn’t get their way with a merchant.
So go find another merchant who does the same thing and get over it. Gees,
there are so many Gay merchants that do websites, produce baking products and
who make amazing floral displays why not use one of them? Common sense would suggest
that you contact one of them and keep the money within your own community
instead of causing all the drama? The lawsuits having to be paid out, are
costing American business owners their livelihood that helped support their
families, and for what? So, someone could have a cake made or a floral
arrangement made. Not only is the American judicial system being raped and used
by special interest groups, but the Supreme Court is also being used by these
same groups to hijack the legal system for their own personal gain. One must
wonder if the justices have encouraged this type of behavior based on their own
personal political ideology since it seems like these cases for special
interest groups are all far left-leaning cases?
Then we have justices who have accepted gifts of designer
clothes and merchandise to thank them for their support or for doing an
interview for some television show or magazine from some celebrity. Not only is
this type of benefit unethical, but it is also unprofessional. Any justice
receiving or accepting such gifts or perks should immediately be brought up on
ethics charges. There is no problem with a justice who wrote a book and who
receives royalties for that work, nor is there a problem with any justice receiving
a paycheck or salary for law school classes they teach, but anything else is questionable.
If a justice doesn’t have a legal purpose for the funds they receive as stated
above, then they should be investigated because the money could be considered a
bribe for favorable decisions based on upcoming cases before the Supreme Court.
It is time that we as Americans begin to question the decisions our lawmakers
on all levels, along with elected officials are making that result in our
freedoms being placed in question. Especially when it comes to the laws of this
land.
Artist and Author Elizabeth
Kilbride is a former political operative, author, scriptwriter, historian, and
journalist. business professional, creative artist, and life coach consultant.
Ms. Kilbride holds a Master's in Criminology and a BS in Business Management
she stepped out of the loop for a while but is now back with a powerful opinion
and voice in the direction of this country and our economy. As a life coach,
she is available to counsel individuals to enjoy their dreams and a better
life. Ms. Kilbride loves to travel, and photograph her surroundings and is also
a gourmet cook who loves to garden and preserve food for the winter months.
No comments:
Post a Comment