.

Showing posts with label Communism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Communism. Show all posts

Friday, January 30, 2026

Hollywood once united us, but now it divides!

 


Hollywood once united us, but now it divides. Hollywood's evolution reflects shifting cultural values and audiences' expectations. While many once embraced traditional American ideals, contemporary narratives often challenge societal norms, sparking debate among viewers.  This change raises questions about creativity versus commercialism in the entertainment industry, not to mention the political ideology of fascist ideals. Are we witnessing a loss of patriotism or just an expansion of storytelling that is lined with communist behaviors?

They've swapped the Dream Factory for an Indoctrination Lab, and audiences are making their choices clear—with wallets and remote controls. 

To revive the arts, let's embrace the universal! They’re entertainers, not guardians of a new woke faith nobody wants. 

If we don’t change course, expect to see plenty of "For Sale" signs at studio gates! It seems like audiences would rather have these days, not lectures.

If folks wanted a sermon, they'd head to church! However, since most Hollywood stars are atheists, their ability to attend church is unlikely.

Let’s take the recent Golden Globe awards ceremony, for example. Actors attending were there as entertainers, not politicians. They think that because they have a celebrity name, they can use that status to control the narrative on political issues. Well, guess what you can’t. We’re not interested in your political opinions, nor are we interested in how you feel about certain issues affecting our country at this time. You are entertainers, so stay in your lane.

A few stood out to this viewer while reviewing the tapes of the awards ceremony: Wanda Sykes claims she is a comedian, but let me say this very clearly, SHE IS NOT FUNNY at all.  She stood on stage and tried to rip Bill Maher, Kevin Hart, and others, claiming they aren’t funny at all. Well, Wanda, go find a real job because you, dear lady, are the one who is not funny; in fact, you’re insulting, rude, ignorant, and invisible to the many people you think you perform for. Plus, you can’t act to save your life.

Let's dive into the world of self-proclaimed activists who might not quite grasp what activism truly means.

Take Mark Ruffalo, for example. At the Golden Globes, he sported a pin that said "Be Good." 🌟 When asked about it on the red carpet, he launched into his woke leftist narrative about Renee Good's tragic murder by an ICE agent.

He also took shots at JD Vance and claimed we’re waging war with Venezuela due to an alleged illegal invasion!

Looks like Mark missed the memo on reading between the lines of media news! He’s never seen “Wag the Dog,” and it shows. We’re not at war with Venezuela, buddy! With those wild claims about Trump being a pedo and rapist—better watch out for defamation! Ruffalo's views? Just another sign he’s lost touch with reality.

Several celebrities, like Natasha Lyonne and Jean Smart, donned the “Be Good” pin. Others sported “Ice Out,” pushing for ICE's defunding. What does this reveal about Hollywood? It suggests a troubling disregard for American safety amidst rising crime from illegal immigrants. With talentless actors raking in millions while producing lackluster films filled with CGI, is it any wonder theaters are dimming? If trends continue, iconic studios may transform into luxury condos instead of creative hubs!

Artists are meant to express freedom of thought, but Hollywood often leans toward a conformity that feels un-American.

Parents worry about studios promoting ideologies masked as entertainment. Woke beliefs seem out of touch with everyday life—while advocating for social justice, many live in luxury.

The good news? Americans are seeking alternative media, and reading books is on the rise because Hollywood would rather remake old movies that had real actors who had talent in them, rather than hire or purchase new scripts written by new writers! So, the final thought of this author, who was once in the political arena, Actors, stay in your lane and take a civics course before you open your mouth and talk about politics. You’re not equipped with the right knowledge to discuss modern-day issues since you don’t know history, the complexities of laws, or even war.

Elizabeth Kilbride is a Writer and Editor with 40 years of experience in writing, 12 of which are in the online content sphere. Author of 5 books and a Graduate with an Associate of Arts degree in Business Management, a bachelor’s in mass communication and cyber-analysis, a master’s in criminology with emphasis on Cybercrime and Identity Theft, and is currently studying for her Ph.D. degree in Criminology. Her work portfolio includes coverage of politics, current affairs, elections, history, and true crime. Elizabeth is also a gourmet cook, life coach, and avid artist in her spare time, proficient in watercolor, acrylic, oil, pen and ink, gouache, and pastels. As a political operative who has worked on over 300 campaigns during her career, Elizabeth has turned many life events into books and movie scripts while using history to weave interesting storylines. She also runs 7 blogs ranging from art to life coaching, food, writing, Gardening, and opinion or history pieces each week.

Thursday, July 06, 2023

Destruction of Society

 


Destruction of Society

In observing what has been happening throughout America in recent years, one can see how the destruction of society is clearly visible. The destruction isn’t hidden, in fact, it’s very evident and clearly a long-term focus of effective destruction of social behaviors, traditions, and ideals that built this country. Let’s break it down so you’ll understand more clearly.

Christianity used to be the religious ideal of this country and was the thread that held together the very fabric of our nation. In recent years those hell-bent on destroying our way of life have destroyed that thread by taking prayer out of the schools. Our homes have been invaded by the devil who crept in and took over the very morals that once held our society together and guided our behavior in society.

The very family which used to be the cornerstone of society has been replaced by feminism in the extreme and the concept of toxic masculinity has torn away at the nuclear family bond. The nuclear family bond produced children who had an imagination that sparked creativity, interest in patriotism, and protecting our country from enemies both foreign and domestic. Instead, we have individuals hell-bent on producing children who are mentally screwed up with a gay agenda resulting in a lack of want in creating children for the future thereby lowering the potential of birth of new citizens. This kind of thinking is destroying the family, the very fabric of society. It would tear apart the nuclear family, which produces stable children, thereby lowering the potential birth rate of new citizens. These same individuals are hell-bent on confusing children into believing they can change the biological sex they were born with into something other than what they are. These children can now identify as a tree and marry another tree whereby confusing them even more in future days. This type of thinking is destroying the old family unit we once knew that created generations of proud Americans willing to fight for freedom and prosperity producing a very powerful nation in the world. A society that cannot reproduce will die once and for all. Just look at the Destiny of the Romans. 

We have begun to turn our male warriors into just humans in fancy uniforms. The military that was once feared on the battlefield, is no longer feared, instead they’re laughed at across the world.  We have allowed mentally deranged individuals and criminal entities into the ranks of our military. These individuals have made society less masculine, and less able to field a strong military. We as a country are more interested in conducting social experiments rather than focusing on military training to ensure winning any battle forced upon us. We have allowed extreme feminists to control the narrative instead of standing ground on many levels of propriety in social relations. But where are those same loudmouth feminists when female athletes need them to stand up to fight for Title 9 standards in today's sports, they are nowhere because they were all talk and now that they are needed, they are silent. They have allowed the powers that be who are hell-bent on making men ineffective by feminizing them to destroy their ability to be effective on the battlefield.  We’ve turned our backs on our veterans, promising them one thing and never delivering it upon discharge, so why would anyone younger join the military only to be lied to once again later in life. Makes no sense.

Our educational system is screwed up to no end. We not only have aging 1960s hippies as professors, but they’ve also recruited new hippy-style students claiming to be activists for social change to become the new professors on campus to spew their Marxist teachings without really knowing or understanding what Karl Marx even stood for and taught. Not only are these Marxist professors in the college classroom, they’re also in the grade school and high school levels. How do I know this, they’re not teaching Civics, American History, or history at all in the classrooms, instead, they are teaching perverted behavior and communist propaganda garbage to the children. Not to mention firing teachers who refuse to use pronouns instead of boy or girl in directing students in learning lessons. This is all part of their agenda to destroy America from within.

Then we have the most heinous of all crimes against society, they are creating divisions between classes and races throughout America. During the 60s it was the Russians who infiltrated our youth causing descent and distrust during Vietnam, but today it is the Democrats who are doing the same with this false propaganda machine they are spinning out of control. They are creating a race war by dividing and conquering the masses with a false sense today of fear, brutality, and hate toward others. They are educating or I should say filling the minds of our youth with nonsense toward authority, I.E., police, to create more unstable communities throughout the country by creating more lawlessness and adding to the criminal behavior of our youth. Promoting looting, robberies, violence, and destruction of our inner cities to help control the masses. By doing this they are devaluing the community so that someone in power can come in and snap up the real estate for pennies on the dollar.  Gaining federal funding to rebuild and profit from the destruction.  Yet no one is realizing this. Devalue the community and you can send someone in to buy up the real estate and create your own community with your rules and regulations.

We can also see where those hell-bent on destroying our country have infiltrated the federal government as was predicted by Senator Joseph McCarthy back in the late 1940s and 1950s. We’ve now seen how the intelligence, Department of Defense security agencies, and justice systems along with both Congress and Senate have been infiltrated and compromised by traitors to this country. We’ve also seen how certain elected officials have used various government corrupt agencies to attack, frame, and target American Citizens for speaking out or whistleblowing their unlawful antics to the masses to let the American people know that the government has been taken over by individuals who want to destroy America as a whole.

We have also seen that these same individuals are trying to take away the rights of the people to bear and own guns under the second amendment. Stripping their rights under the constitution away from them one amendment at a time. They’re also creating a situation where individuals are reliant on the government for food, shelter, utility assistance and so much more just to be able to survive.  

The individuals trying to control the country are using the high-tech industry to control the voice of the people in all aspects of life, social media, and programs to which they give their opinion whereby censoring the voice of the people.  

As I said before the leadership of this nation has been compromised to the point where many are conducting criminal activities, subverting the constitution, and committing treasonous activities while representing their home constituency and office.  Not to mention taking bribes and excess funding all the while selling out this country to the highest bidder. Linking family members and lobbyists to government contracts that they have no business being connected with and pushing their own political agenda.  

The last thing observed would be the dismantling and disrespect of our national monuments, statues, and symbols. To have sports players who are paid big bucks kneeling during the national anthem is not only disrespectful to the nation but to the memory of every soldier, sailor, airman, and Marine who died for this country. The lack of history being taught in schools and in the home is mind-boggling.  Then we have citizens of this country who were born here not knowing the geography of this country or who promote the hate and division of the very nation they live in is horrible.  Wake up America and begin the fight that is long overdue. Fight for America as our founding fathers once did. Stand up to those who would try to silence us as citizens and begin to let them know we won’t go quietly. Let your voices be heard at the voting station in your area. Don’t vote party line, vote for the best candidate that aligns with your morals and values.

 

Author Elizabeth Kilbride is a former political operative, author, scriptwriter, historian, and journalist. business professional, creative artist, and life coach consultant. Ms. Kilbride holds a Master's in Criminology and a BS in Business Management she stepped out of the loop for a while but is now back with a powerful opinion and voice in the direction of this country and our economy. As a life coach, she is available to counsel individuals to enjoy their dreams and a better life. Ms. Kilbride loves to travel, and photograph her surroundings and is also a gourmet cook who loves to garden and preserve food for the winter months.

Sunday, February 09, 2020

Should Entertainers turn into Political Preachers?



When I think about the entertainment industry, I think about the actors who acted during the golden era of entertainment, John Wayne, Kirk Douglas, James Cagney, Fred Astaire, Ginger Rogers, Ronald Reagan, Rita Hayworth, Frank Sinatra, Bing Crosby, and many others. Those were the days of true entertainment. What we have today in the industry is nothing more than egotistical imposters claiming to be actors with no real talent at all. In fact, in today's entertainment industry we have nothing more than individuals who want to show that they’re activists for some cause or another, yet they don’t know or understand the complexities that revolve around the issue or cause they’re fighting for. For example, when it comes to climate change, they know nothing about science, or when it comes to politics, they know nothing about how politics works.  Back in the day, when the real Hollywood elite stood up for a cause, they stood proud as American’s fighting for America and those who serve in uniform defending America and American Values, many of whom were reservists in the same military branch, but today, they wouldn’t know what it was like to live on a military base or even be associated with a military family.  In other words, they have no clue what it’s like to involved in a military family, so why are they opening up their mouth and causing havoc.

What’s amazing is that some of the Hollywood voices being so loud haven’t had a gig in many years but to them, they need to be seen before the cameras making it sound like they know or understand politics and world affairs. Majority of what these has-beens speak about make no sense or better yet what they say is more communistic in nature. When did American Citizens believe that Communism is better than the American freedom and capitalism that these actors relish in making them money on their films or other businesses they own? It doesn’t make sense to me as an American Citizen.
So what it boils down to is this – actors and entertainers such as singers make their millions off the American Fans that are loyal fans who love their work, then they turn on that loyalty by opening up their mouth and spewing hatred for America on them when they start talking about things they know nothing about, like politics and world affairs and show their true ignorance on these issues. For example, one actress spews hatred for the MAGA hat claiming it is really the new KKK hat – two different issues there sistah while a singer stands on stage and spews her political views to an audience that paid $250.00 a ticket to witness her perform on stage only to endure her political rants about things she knows nothing about. How disappointing. I’d be demanding a refund for that ticket price if I was stupid enough to pay that price to hear any entertainer sing and dance half-naked on stage. Nope, not that stupid. Don’t these entertainers realize all we want from them is to be entertained not preached to do by someone who doesn’t have a clue about politics or world events or worse yet, hear what they think about various social change ticket items that they feel are important to them or that they heard at some party at a famous person's house or on some jet they were sharing to come into town on? All we want to do is be entertained, that’s it, so please don't preach to us about things you know nothing about, and don't use interviews, stages or awards show platforms for your political anger and hatred. 

Author Elizabeth Kilbride is a former political operative, author, scriptwriter, historian, journalist, business professional, and creative artist. Although she has been out of the loop for a while, she is back with a powerful opinion and voice in how this country and the entertainment industry has gone off course. She is determined to bring to light the issues in a clear and opinionated voice.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

The END of Free Thinking (as we know it)




"Are you willing to be sponged out, erased, cancelled, made nothing?"
                                                            D.H. Lawrence - the Phoenix

What are you willing to become? Lawrence wrote the poem "Phoenix" at the turn of the century, when the world seemed to be tilting toward collectivism and he feared individual thinking was being erased from the conscience mind. Was he right? Have we become a society where free thinking has been thrown out the window for something else?

In today's world, students no longer trust their teachers or instructors because they no longer effectively guide them through the minefield of accusation that is public education. The lack of trust goes both ways.

Teachers who no longer trust their students utilize a plagiarism detection system, known as TurnItIn.com, to further humiliate their students into obedience. Each student is required to submit each essay, term paper, and original work to this growing parasite of copyright violation and career vulnerability database. Maybe if the teacher taught the proper way to write a paper, the need for such a program would not exist. As we have pointed out, throughout this series, when a student is falsely accused, that student’s only recourse is to drop the class, avoid the professor, or appeal to be exempt from having to submit their work to a system that is dangerous to their security at worst, and infringes on their original thought at best.

There is more concern given the 1% of students who are gaming the system, using the work and words of others to advance their grade, and pulling the wool over the teacher’s eyes. The teacher, mired in pride of not being duped, would rather tell 100% of their students of their blatant lack of trust in the hopes of scaring the 1% of rogue students onto the path of the straight and narrow. As seen in this series, the implications of an expectation of a potential student violation is often more violating to teacher-student trust than the mere existence of plagiarism  in the first place.

 Chris Lloyd '06, chairman of the Honor Committee, said the implementation of anti-plagiarizing software at Princeton would not violate students' rights.

"We don't have an Honor Code in which professors trust students blindly," Lloyd said. "Professors trust students to proctor each other. If professors don't have oversight over what a student is doing in their room, it seems a reasonable means to see if work is a student's own.” 

There seems to be so much anxiety over what may be produced in the student’s bedroom, that little attention or concern is given their future capability of what will be produced in the boardroom. The ultimate goal of any university is to release upon the business world a person who has the ability to think and make proper decisions that will help keep our economic engine running. But in reality, the only product being produced in today's schools and universities is a human monkey-wrench that will be thrown into an already effective and efficient machine.  

The ability to think freely has been stymied by the very institution to which is required to teach creative thinking - our school system. With the use of TurnItIn, we are producing the very thing we disdain: a nation of non-thinking, mindless automatons capable of producing exactly what the professor (or boss) wants them to produce, requiring countless hours of oversight and hand-holding. The student is no longer capable of individual thought, for exercising thought brings risk. These risks require a student to feel emotion, compassion or even love. These risks are not acceptable in a world filled with distrust, hate and a lack of compassion for another human being – what we call ‘the real world.’ 

When a student leaves school and enters the business world, they mirror what their boss wants in order to gain favor with said boss – even if the boss might be wrong in his or her thinking, resulting in the company being shut down, job losses, economic destruction of the community, etc. Like the boss who doesn't know how to think for themselves, the professors, having already determined their own brilliance of thought and mind, are only capable of arriving at a specific point. They then expect each student to arrive at that same point or theory merely to feed the overinflated ego of said professor! The teacher no longer wants to see what the student may think, but wants their own thinking confirmed by a multitude of “good students,” each arriving at the same conclusion and analysis, but somehow doing do in a way that doesn’t flag the plagiarism detector. Is this free thinking, or is it a pattern of group thinking?

This pattern simply cannot sustain itself.

With the use of a program, such as how TurnItIn will continue to grow and grow with additional papers and products, all coming to similar conclusions with different words, the ability to think freely will diminish in just a few years. Future students will try and try to phrase words together to attain the goals of the same patterned syllabi, yet without effectively being able to avoid correlation. Students are already growing discouraged, as there is no way to re-pattern the same thought without using words and phrases that have been previously recorded somewhere. There is no way for the student to glean through millions of entries, but the computer program can. And students will increasing become victims to the very mechanism that is designed to protect them and allow them to grow in thought and mind – they will either stand before ethics committees decrying their innocence, or simply choose to avoid the system that produces more plagiarists than poets. The future looks bleak, does it not?

Students are trying, but are increasingly having to do more explanation of character than defense of original research. Their purposes and goals are suspect, when they are merely trying to navigate the minefield set up by an untrusting populace. When the professor has already abdicated their role of instructing the student to greater academic relevance, even when the student plagiarized for convenience or by malicious intent, the end of free thinking has permeated its will to the highest level - shirking academic protection and inspiration to excellence.

What do you expect? It is not permitted us neither to write, nor to speak, nor even to think.  If we speak, it is easy to interpret our words, and still easier our writings. In sum, since no one can condemn us to an auto da fé for our secret thoughts, they threaten us with eternal burning by the order of God Himself, if we don't think like the Jacobins. They have persuaded the government that if we were to have common sense, the whole state would be in flames, and that the nation would become the most miserable on earth. –Voltaire, ‘Freedom of Thought’

A government or school thrives by forcing all its denizens into the prescribed pattern of thought. Is this not Communism at its best? But who can really regulate thought? Isn’t the mere attempt at regulating thought rife with failure from the start? And what would the business climate think of an army of mindless automatons about to be released, resumes in hand, unto their shores of innovation and creativity? How can a citizenry be innovative and creative when their schools have cut funding to all creative classes such as music, art and creative writing? These very classes teach a student to use their creative mind to think outside the box and eventually solve complex problems in an individualized way.

Enter GroupThink.

Research strongly suggests that people are more creative when they enjoy privacy and freedom from interruption. And the most spectacularly creative people in many fields are often introverted, according to studies by the psychologists Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Gregory Feist. They’re extroverted enough to exchange and advance ideas, but see themselves as independent and individualistic. They’re not joiners by nature.

Our schools have also been transformed by the New Groupthink. Today, elementary school classrooms are commonly arranged in pods of desks, the better to foster group learning. Even subjects like math and creative writing are often taught as committee projects. In one fourth-grade classroom I visited in New York City, students engaged in group work were forbidden to ask a question unless every member of the group had the very same question.  

When free thinking is erased, cancelled and made nothing, as Lawrence said, what will we have left? Like-minded individuals who are replicable in the business world who are not capable of thinking for themselves, coming up with great ideas or writing prose worthy of a noble peace prize? Instead, we are left with mindless zombies ready to follow the word of every pundit, irresponsible journalist, politician or leader who says what they have been programmed to follow.  Automated zombies coming to a place near you. You reap what you sow!


 Invited co-author of this article, Sean McGowan is published author, a teacher of Civics and American History, as well as a Chaplain.

NEXT: Critical Thinking Disappears

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

"Picasso - The Art of War" Part 10: Art and Culture, a World Apart


“Computers are useless. They can only give you answers” Pablo Picasso

The art and culture world is just like a computer – many forms of communication that creates a web of intricate deception. A world all its own filled with an array of characters ranging from artists, poets, writers, intellects, musicians, dancers, stage and screen, media and surprisingly enough, diplomats from all countries.

It is no wonder why Picasso, a master seducer and lover of women would relish the artistic world, not for the art, but for the sex. If a person craves sexual activity, they enter the art world, because at least it’s safe; secrets are always kept, instead of venturing into the bad section of town where it’s much more dangerous. Secrets are kept close which makes this arena the best opportunity for intelligence gathering. A culture of sleazy back room deals in who will succeed and who will fail. Those with the power to grease the wheel of profit do so with lies and deception. It’s a world filled with art, but is the art real or fake? Two worlds intertwined into one: those who create the art because they love being creative and those who profit from them by selling their souls by becoming a propaganda artist because a patron of the arts waves dollars before their starving eyes.

Picasso started his career much the same way when a patron by the name of Gertrude Stein, a American millionaires offered to take him under her wing in 1905 Having such a wealthy patron doors began to open for the young artist. Stein and her two brothers, Michael and Leo helped his career launch by purchasing many of his early works. Quickly he became a hit among those within Paris and soon he had a following of other artists following him around.

Through his patronage of Gertrude Stein, Picasso was introduced to many important figures; one of them was Serge Diaghiley’s Ballets Russes. As the artist who would create the scenery for the Russian Ballet troop performing in Rome, Picasso’s web of characters would expand, thanks to his marrying Olga Khoklova, a ballerina with the troupe. It was through his involvement with Olga and the cultural world she belonged, he would be introduced to a man by the name of Nicholas Roerich, a Russian artist. After returning to Paris, it was Khokhlova with her social connections that would raise Picasso from just another artist to that of one worthy of being included into high society. Picasso no longer needed the likes of Stein, he now had his own personal patron in Khokhlova who helped him achieve his ultimate fame and fortune, allowing him to enjoy the social niceties in life during the 1920s Paris.

Roerich would later become a world famous artist in his own right, but he was also an ardent supporter of the Soviets in the 30's and WWII. Picasso being a member of the French Communist Party before he arrived in Rome made for an instant friendship between these two men. It is believed that after meeting Roerich, Picasso began his propaganda campaign to help further the cause of the Communist Party.

Picasso became the number one propaganda artist for the Communist Party for the next twenty-five years and his following grew to a network worldwide which made him a key player in the propaganda wars.

The Art and Culture world would be transformed during Picasso’s lifetime into an invisible government filled with creativity, intellectual freedom and cultural power warped by communist ideology wrapped in a nice neat package ready for sale to the willing buyer.

American in the meantime was being accused of being a cultural desert by the Soviets and in 1947, the Department of State began fighting back. An exhibition called, “Advancing American Art” was organized and paid for by the Department of State and went international. This created a stir across the globe. While the Soviets became the patron to many Russian artists, musicians and writers, the American Government countered their effort by becoming patron too.

Realizing the Soviets and the KGB were using art and culture as a tool to further their cause, America counter attacked by creating the Congress of Artistic Freedom. The Congress of Artistic Freedom was a covert unit under the CIA with a budget of approximately $160,000 (3 million by today’s standards), in 1950 as the Cold War begin to escalate. Politically this helped them promote their cause of Anti-Communistic behavior via the visual arts and the written word; it also gave them a golden opportunity to gather intelligence to safeguard America.

Over the next seventeen years, while Picasso continued with his propaganda work, the Congress of Artistic Freedom would open offices in thirty-five countries, while creating and publishing two dozen magazines world wide. The unit would be headed up by a CIA Agent, yet the staff comprised of academic intellectuals from Harvard, Yale and other Ivy League Universities who were known for collecting works of art and writing novels in their spare time, A treasure trove of liberalism became the new culture of the art world with a new breed of writers, poets, artists and musicians.. Abstract Expressionism was created because it didn’t make any sense. Socialistic Realism made Abstract Expressionism appear to be non-conformity which drove them mad.

How did the CIA conduct their patronage of the arts? It was a simple, they would approach a known millionaire and convince them to create a non-profit wherein the CIA would funnel money to them and direct them on what exhibitions, artists and magazines to support. Through their intricate web, the Rockefeller Foundation which was the main patron of the Museum of Modern Art and largest holder of Picasso artwork, the Ford Foundation, and many others did what they could to assist the CIA in their mission. New York City would become the mecca of the art world in the United States. Greenwich Village or SoHo became the liberal hotspot of writers, magazine editors, fashion designers and drugs. On Long Island the Hamptons attracted an international crowd of series art collectors, many with hidden art work never to be seen by the average person, would be come the power broker capitol of art dealing.

In 1967, the Congress for Cultural Freedom was exposed and embarrassed because of its CIA sponsorships connections throughout the previous decade. Although it was successful in ultimately helping to negate the Communism's appeal to artists and intellectuals; undermining the Communist position of moral superiority. It must be said that the untimely halt of this program helped perpetuate the spread of Communism throughout the United States throughout the Vietnam Era and beyond.

Today, the top five cities for dealing in art are NYC, London, Paris, Tokyo, and Singapore. Each of these cities has museums that hold thousands of works of art displayed for public view. Only question is, are these pieces of art truly the original pieces or are they fake? With the cost of maintaining precious artwork coupled with the cost of insurance to safeguard these pieces, one has to wonder if they are the originals. It’s a known fact within the art world that many museums sell off their valuable pieces because they can no longer afford to insure them in their collections. Curators throughout the world are known to quietly sell them to private collectors to ensure their museum can continue to flourish financially. A duplicate copy is created and hung in its place.

While the world views art as beautiful and alluring, why is that Picasso’s art work from 1965 through 1967 still eludes the public? The hunt for Picasso’s Tarnschriften (German for camouflaged art that was used by the Resistance in WWII) is on ladies and gentleman; where are these pieces? I know of one piece, but it’s the final piece in his collection, I’d be interested in seeing what the other pieces have to show of his covert spying network. Why are they hidden from the public? The Picasso family is in search of them and so are Chinese Art Dealers, WHY? In fact, Chinese Art Dealers are buying up his later work faster than they can be put on the market. Is it because Picasso sent these pieces to friends and colleagues, his Cold War Trophy Pieces, to ensure they had the hidden keys to his success for the Communist Party?
Picasso’s intricate web of deception and influence throughout the occult world of Art and Culture was driven by his ego. While he seemed like the mad scientist yearning to find the final formula to his experiment, in the end the occult of socialistic ideology used him for their own deception.

 #####

 
"Picasso - The Art of War" is a series written & copyrighted to Author Elizabeth Kilbride 2011

All information contained within this series will be used in a book entitled “Picasso – The Art of War” all rights reserved and copyrighted to Elizabeth Kilbride. Permission is not granted to anyone for the copying or distribution of this information in print or media without the express permission of the author. This copyright is under both U.S.A and International Copyright Laws.

Thursday, May 05, 2011

"Picasso - The Art of War" Part 9: Political Take Over

Progressivism isn’t a new phrase nor is it a new ideology. In order to understand current day politics, and how it is directly connected to “Picasso – The Art of War,” one must look into history to understand

Throughout America, many believe the progressive movement is a new trend in politics, when in fact; it started almost one hundred years ago. Its origins go back to the campaign between Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive ("Bull Moose") Party candidate, Republican nominee William Howard Taft and Democratic candidate Woodrow Wilson. During the 1912 election the infighting between Roosevelt and Taft divided the Republican Party right down the middle, which afforded Wilson enough votes to win the election and become our 28th President.

Before this campaign, many stones were put in place in the mortar to lay the foundation of the progressive movement. Many of those stones were put in place by Teddy Roosevelt during his presidency with favoritism and concessions for votes given; authorizing contracts to US Steel and many others during his presidency. Because of his love of the wilderness, he aligned himself with certain groups who told him by saving a forest he’d be saving America. Now I can’t complain about preserving land for future generations, but that wasn’t his objective. His objective in creating the land trust was to ensure future votes from those groups (founders of the Save the Planet Organizations). In essence these were bribes for their cooperation. During the 1912 campaign Roosevelt began his double speak campaign tactic, agreeing to give every group something in exchange for their votes. Meanwhile, another grassroots effort was in the development stage, organized labor was formulated. In addressing labor groups, Roosevelt stepping up on his “Bully Pulpit” encouraged small groups of labor workers to join what was being called unions so their joint voices could be heard in Washington, DC. Then President Howard Taft was being bullied by Roosevelt because Roosevelt was upset Taft was undoing certain programs he had put into place.

Because of the infighting within the Republican Party, Woodrow Wilson’s win wasn’t just a win; it was the foundation, the wood that would one day create the fire in which modern day progressivism would become the fuel to set the tinder’s a blaze beneath our Constitution. During that one campaign many factors were at play that ultimately transformed this country from a freedom loving country to a country of dependency. Let’s examine Wilson’s administration and what came out of it that brought us to today.

Who was Woodrow Wilson? Wilson was the Governor from New Jersey who in 1910 laid out a very aggressive progressive platform that transformed the state into what it is today – over taxed, government run state that has lost its history and its integrity. During the 1912 campaign, his small scale plan for New Jersey was applied to the entire country. He believed each state should give up their individualism and become a greater part of these United States – the beginnings of destruction for America’s Constitution.

Meanwhile, behind the scenes a political grassroots effort was being put into place to over throw the government and take control, slowly and methodically. The father of the term “New World Order” systematically created the Federal Reserve as a private organization, institution of a forced income tax as a regular way to raise funds for government use and let’s not forget his creation of the Federal Trade Commission to ensure they could control every aspect of domestic and international trade of goods. .

Meanwhile, he gave the order to send troops to Latin America between 1914 and 1918 to overthrow Mexico, Haiti, Cuba, Panama and Nicaragua. In Nicaragua he personally selected the replacement of a new President to force the passage of the Bryan-Chamorro Treaty. In Haiti, he controlled the election to ensure his hand picked President was elected, whereby controlling the interests of the country. He also ordered troops to enter the Dominican Republic. While negotiating a treaty with Columbia he was apologizing for America’s role in the Panama Revolution in which Teddy Roosevelt was involved in during 1903-1904. This was the first time a sitting President ever apologized for another Presidents action while in the White House to a foreign country. This was a strike against Roosevelt for his acts in Latin America during his presidency.

Wilson was a coward! As American allies died throughout Europe during World War I, he refused to get involved. It wasn’t until after his reelection in 1916, he was forced to engage after being told German ships and submarines were attacking British Passenger Liners carrying American Passengers in the Atlantic Ocean.

During the middle of his second administration he openly welcomed socialists who supported the war efforts, but covered his six by creating the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. All the while he was creating his League of Nations and in 1920, still suffering from his stroke; he sent a request to Congress to vote in favor of the League of Nations to take over America. Congress voted against it. This wasn’t just his idea; it was the conception of a large group of individuals within his circle who wanted to control everything, including the United States of America. At the same time he was lobbying for the League of Nations,

This writer was surprised to learn that former Senator of New York and former Secretary of War, Elihu Root who was the Chairman of the Republican Party in 1912 was the spearhead of the Progressive Movement. After researching Mr. Root’s background it’s clear he was turned somewhere along his career. As a Diplomat for the Wilson Administration in 1917, he was sent to Russia and was instrumental in convincing them to stay in the war, even though he was sent there to talk peace. FDR also a Progressive Democrat became Secretary of War under Wilson.

Seven years after Wilson left the White House, those who were part of the progressive movement joined forces with the Democratic Party. Each of these people had communist leanings although on the surface they appeared to be patriotic Americans.

Since 1928, politics had taken on a whole new role for the Communist Party in how they dictated domestic and international policies.

FDR was another progressive who helped change the American Dream by creating program after program to dominate the American people. He created and orchestrated the New Deal Coalition whereby helping to form labor unions, corporate machines, which ultimately created a welfare state of mind among ethnic groups. Although he was on the surface a patriot, quietly he used his powers to transform the failed League of Nations into what’s now known as the United Nations. FDR was responsible for the Bretton Woods System which was the corner stone to what is now known as the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Together with the IMF the creation of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) was created, both of which are now part of the World Bank Group. All these organizations became operational in 1945. Although the objective of the Bretton Woods System obligated each country involved to adopt a join monetary policy to maintain the exchange rate system world wide by using the U.S. dollar as its base, it gave way to much power to the IMF to bridge any balance shortfalls. FDR’s New Deal Act and the creation of the Bretton Woods System were each based on the Keynesian economics.

The Keynesian Economic Theory was created by John Maynard Keynes in the 1920’s. Keynes authored a book called "The Theory of Money and the Foreign Exchanges” wherein he states. “Active government policy could be effective in managing the economy. Rather than seeing an unbalanced government budget as wrong, he believed that “countercyclical fiscal policies’, were a sure bet. Anyone in business knows you can’t spend what you don’t have, however, reinvesting in your company by tightening the purse strings is good business practices. Keynes believed in “deficit spending when a nation's economy suffers from recession or when recovery is long-delayed and unemployment is persistently high—and the suppression of inflation in boom times by either increasing taxes or cutting back on government outlays”. His approach works on paper, but it’s nothing more than a band-aid approach to a fiscal problem. This has been the approach of the Federal Government and other countries for the last sixty years. Keynes says it best “"in the long run, we are all dead." In other words, put a band-aid on the problem now because by the time they figure it out, we will be gone. As is evidenced by the last sixties years, the Keynesian theory of Economics has failed miserably.

Another Progressive (Richard Nixon) unilaterally terminated the United States ability to convert dollars to gold when he signed an Executive Order announcing the U.S. will no longer back its currency with gold, declaring "[t]he Bretton Woods system officially ended and the dollar became fully 'fiat currency,' backed by nothing but the promise of the federal government." This has been dubbed the Nixon shock. This decision left the U.S. Currency vulnerable and at the mercy of the Federal Reserve.

Each of these individual actions were progressive movement decisions, each strategically planned and executed by those within the Communist Party. Those involved helped impact the world stage by furthering the New World Order agenda of the Communist Party without realizing it.

Its no wonder why in the 1950’s when McCarthy began his Un-American investigations everyone in Washington, DC and across the country was in a panic. According to historical records McCarthy had a long list of suspected Communists who had infiltrated the State Department; the War Department later renamed Department of Defense, Dept of Commerce, Labor Department, staffers in the White House and even a few within Congress and Senate. He also had a long list of Union Bosses who were Communist Sympathizers. With so many already in positions of power, one has to wonder if McCarthy wasn’t strategically taken out of the great game, would he have been successful in his attempt to clean up Washington, DC? What would have happened if he was able to charge these people with treason or subversion; would we have the problems we have in today’s political climate? We will never know.

In today’s political arena one has to wonder if those involved in the Progressive movement even realize how they have been used as pawns to perpetuate the Communist agenda set in motion during the 1912 election. Many in elected office today use the same type of propaganda machine that helped get Wilson and the others elected, yet they just don’t give a damn because it’s not about America, it’s all about their next election and not about upholding the United States Constitution.

The ideology of the Communist Progressive movement is what enticed Pablo Picasso to use his talents as an artist to incorporate propaganda into his art. Picasso wasn’t a great artist, but he was easily persuaded because of his ego into using a talent God gave him for evil.


NEXT: "Picasso - The Art of War" Part 10: Art and Culture, a World Apart



"Picasso - The Art of War" is a series written & copyrighted to Author Elizabeth Kilbride 2011
All information contained within this series will be used in a book entitled “Picasso – The Art of War” all rights reserved and copyrighted to Elizabeth Kilbride. Permission is not granted to anyone for the copying or distribution of this information in print or media without the express permission of the author. This copyright is under both U.S.A and International Copyright Laws.