Misuse of Power in question

For the last few months, the world has been overpowered with news about President Trumps’ misconduct in dealing with the Newly Elected President of Ukraine by encouraging him to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter along with the conspiracy that the Ukraine, not Russia was behind the interference during the 2016 Presidential Election here in America. However, the use of misuse of power is not in the hands of the President, but clearing in the hands of Congress, specifically Congresswoman Nany Pelosi (CA-D) and her ilk, Congressman Schiff (CA-D) and Congressman Nadler (NY-D) who have misused their congressional powers by implementing the waste of time and farce behind these proceedings against President Trump. As an independent voter, and someone who has been in the political arena for most of her life, (50 years’ worth of her life) I can attest that the abuse of powers is not at the feet of the President but that of Congresswoman Pelosi, Congressman Schiff and Nadler and it is these three elected officials to whom should be sanctioned and removed from office for their misuse of power that they have been given as elected officials.  

According to the house of Representatives own website states the following:

“The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article II, section 4

As a legal course of review and by following the above section 4 of the Constitution, the President of the United States has not been convicted in a court of law of committing Treason, nor has he accepted a bribe  or paid a bride for anything, in fact, he has given up his salary to various federal Agencies to help them reduce their budgetary requirements. In addition, he has not been convicted of any high crimes or misdemeanors in a court of law, therefore, the bogus charges being brought against him by Congresswoman Pelosi and her party of misfits are absolutely and legally illegal charges claiming abuse of power while in his office as President.

So instead of going after the President of the United States on false charges, how about we go after all Congressional representatives who accept bribes from lobbyists in exchange for favors on votes regarding legislation that would benefit their company or organization. Now that’s truly a bride worthy of impeachment or sanctions don’t you think?

Author Elizabeth Kilbride is a former political operative, author, scriptwriter, historian, journalist, business professional, and creative artist. Although she has been out of the loop for a while, she is back with a powerful opinion and voice in how this country and the entertainment industry has gone off course. She is determined to bring to light the issues in a clear and opinionated voice.

"Picasso - The Art of War" Part 10: Art and Culture, a World Apart

“Computers are useless. They can only give you answers” Pablo Picasso

The art and culture world is just like a computer – many forms of communication that creates a web of intricate deception. A world all its own filled with an array of characters ranging from artists, poets, writers, intellects, musicians, dancers, stage and screen, media and surprisingly enough, diplomats from all countries.

It is no wonder why Picasso, a master seducer and lover of women would relish the artistic world, not for the art, but for the sex. If a person craves sexual activity, they enter the art world, because at least it’s safe; secrets are always kept, instead of venturing into the bad section of town where it’s much more dangerous. Secrets are kept close which makes this arena the best opportunity for intelligence gathering. A culture of sleazy back room deals in who will succeed and who will fail. Those with the power to grease the wheel of profit do so with lies and deception. It’s a world filled with art, but is the art real or fake? Two worlds intertwined into one: those who create the art because they love being creative and those who profit from them by selling their souls by becoming a propaganda artist because a patron of the arts waves dollars before their starving eyes.

Picasso started his career much the same way when a patron by the name of Gertrude Stein, a American millionaires offered to take him under her wing in 1905 Having such a wealthy patron doors began to open for the young artist. Stein and her two brothers, Michael and Leo helped his career launch by purchasing many of his early works. Quickly he became a hit among those within Paris and soon he had a following of other artists following him around.

Through his patronage of Gertrude Stein, Picasso was introduced to many important figures; one of them was Serge Diaghiley’s Ballets Russes. As the artist who would create the scenery for the Russian Ballet troop performing in Rome, Picasso’s web of characters would expand, thanks to his marrying Olga Khoklova, a ballerina with the troupe. It was through his involvement with Olga and the cultural world she belonged, he would be introduced to a man by the name of Nicholas Roerich, a Russian artist. After returning to Paris, it was Khokhlova with her social connections that would raise Picasso from just another artist to that of one worthy of being included into high society. Picasso no longer needed the likes of Stein, he now had his own personal patron in Khokhlova who helped him achieve his ultimate fame and fortune, allowing him to enjoy the social niceties in life during the 1920s Paris.

Roerich would later become a world famous artist in his own right, but he was also an ardent supporter of the Soviets in the 30's and WWII. Picasso being a member of the French Communist Party before he arrived in Rome made for an instant friendship between these two men. It is believed that after meeting Roerich, Picasso began his propaganda campaign to help further the cause of the Communist Party.

Picasso became the number one propaganda artist for the Communist Party for the next twenty-five years and his following grew to a network worldwide which made him a key player in the propaganda wars.

The Art and Culture world would be transformed during Picasso’s lifetime into an invisible government filled with creativity, intellectual freedom and cultural power warped by communist ideology wrapped in a nice neat package ready for sale to the willing buyer.

American in the meantime was being accused of being a cultural desert by the Soviets and in 1947, the Department of State began fighting back. An exhibition called, “Advancing American Art” was organized and paid for by the Department of State and went international. This created a stir across the globe. While the Soviets became the patron to many Russian artists, musicians and writers, the American Government countered their effort by becoming patron too.

Realizing the Soviets and the KGB were using art and culture as a tool to further their cause, America counter attacked by creating the Congress of Artistic Freedom. The Congress of Artistic Freedom was a covert unit under the CIA with a budget of approximately $160,000 (3 million by today’s standards), in 1950 as the Cold War begin to escalate. Politically this helped them promote their cause of Anti-Communistic behavior via the visual arts and the written word; it also gave them a golden opportunity to gather intelligence to safeguard America.

Over the next seventeen years, while Picasso continued with his propaganda work, the Congress of Artistic Freedom would open offices in thirty-five countries, while creating and publishing two dozen magazines world wide. The unit would be headed up by a CIA Agent, yet the staff comprised of academic intellectuals from Harvard, Yale and other Ivy League Universities who were known for collecting works of art and writing novels in their spare time, A treasure trove of liberalism became the new culture of the art world with a new breed of writers, poets, artists and musicians.. Abstract Expressionism was created because it didn’t make any sense. Socialistic Realism made Abstract Expressionism appear to be non-conformity which drove them mad.

How did the CIA conduct their patronage of the arts? It was a simple, they would approach a known millionaire and convince them to create a non-profit wherein the CIA would funnel money to them and direct them on what exhibitions, artists and magazines to support. Through their intricate web, the Rockefeller Foundation which was the main patron of the Museum of Modern Art and largest holder of Picasso artwork, the Ford Foundation, and many others did what they could to assist the CIA in their mission. New York City would become the mecca of the art world in the United States. Greenwich Village or SoHo became the liberal hotspot of writers, magazine editors, fashion designers and drugs. On Long Island the Hamptons attracted an international crowd of series art collectors, many with hidden art work never to be seen by the average person, would be come the power broker capitol of art dealing.

In 1967, the Congress for Cultural Freedom was exposed and embarrassed because of its CIA sponsorships connections throughout the previous decade. Although it was successful in ultimately helping to negate the Communism's appeal to artists and intellectuals; undermining the Communist position of moral superiority. It must be said that the untimely halt of this program helped perpetuate the spread of Communism throughout the United States throughout the Vietnam Era and beyond.

Today, the top five cities for dealing in art are NYC, London, Paris, Tokyo, and Singapore. Each of these cities has museums that hold thousands of works of art displayed for public view. Only question is, are these pieces of art truly the original pieces or are they fake? With the cost of maintaining precious artwork coupled with the cost of insurance to safeguard these pieces, one has to wonder if they are the originals. It’s a known fact within the art world that many museums sell off their valuable pieces because they can no longer afford to insure them in their collections. Curators throughout the world are known to quietly sell them to private collectors to ensure their museum can continue to flourish financially. A duplicate copy is created and hung in its place.

While the world views art as beautiful and alluring, why is that Picasso’s art work from 1965 through 1967 still eludes the public? The hunt for Picasso’s Tarnschriften (German for camouflaged art that was used by the Resistance in WWII) is on ladies and gentleman; where are these pieces? I know of one piece, but it’s the final piece in his collection, I’d be interested in seeing what the other pieces have to show of his covert spying network. Why are they hidden from the public? The Picasso family is in search of them and so are Chinese Art Dealers, WHY? In fact, Chinese Art Dealers are buying up his later work faster than they can be put on the market. Is it because Picasso sent these pieces to friends and colleagues, his Cold War Trophy Pieces, to ensure they had the hidden keys to his success for the Communist Party?
Picasso’s intricate web of deception and influence throughout the occult world of Art and Culture was driven by his ego. While he seemed like the mad scientist yearning to find the final formula to his experiment, in the end the occult of socialistic ideology used him for their own deception.

 #####

 

"Picasso - The Art of War" is a series written & copyrighted to Author Elizabeth Kilbride 2011

All information contained within this series will be used in a book entitled “Picasso – The Art of War” all rights reserved and copyrighted to Elizabeth Kilbride. Permission is not granted to anyone for the copying or distribution of this information in print or media without the express permission of the author. This copyright is under both U.S.A and International Copyright Laws.

"Picasso - The Art of War" Part 9: Political Take Over

Progressivism isn’t a new phrase nor is it a new ideology. In order to understand current day politics, and how it is directly connected to “Picasso – The Art of War,” one must look into history to understand

Throughout America, many believe the progressive movement is a new trend in politics, when in fact; it started almost one hundred years ago. Its origins go back to the campaign between Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive ("Bull Moose") Party candidate, Republican nominee William Howard Taft and Democratic candidate Woodrow Wilson. During the 1912 election the infighting between Roosevelt and Taft divided the Republican Party right down the middle, which afforded Wilson enough votes to win the election and become our 28th President.

Before this campaign, many stones were put in place in the mortar to lay the foundation of the progressive movement. Many of those stones were put in place by Teddy Roosevelt during his presidency with favoritism and concessions for votes given; authorizing contracts to US Steel and many others during his presidency. Because of his love of the wilderness, he aligned himself with certain groups who told him by saving a forest he’d be saving America. Now I can’t complain about preserving land for future generations, but that wasn’t his objective. His objective in creating the land trust was to ensure future votes from those groups (founders of the Save the Planet Organizations). In essence these were bribes for their cooperation. During the 1912 campaign Roosevelt began his double speak campaign tactic, agreeing to give every group something in exchange for their votes. Meanwhile, another grassroots effort was in the development stage, organized labor was formulated. In addressing labor groups, Roosevelt stepping up on his “Bully Pulpit” encouraged small groups of labor workers to join what was being called unions so their joint voices could be heard in Washington, DC. Then President Howard Taft was being bullied by Roosevelt because Roosevelt was upset Taft was undoing certain programs he had put into place.

Because of the infighting within the Republican Party, Woodrow Wilson’s win wasn’t just a win; it was the foundation, the wood that would one day create the fire in which modern day progressivism would become the fuel to set the tinder’s a blaze beneath our Constitution. During that one campaign many factors were at play that ultimately transformed this country from a freedom loving country to a country of dependency. Let’s examine Wilson’s administration and what came out of it that brought us to today.

Who was Woodrow Wilson? Wilson was the Governor from New Jersey who in 1910 laid out a very aggressive progressive platform that transformed the state into what it is today – over taxed, government run state that has lost its history and its integrity. During the 1912 campaign, his small scale plan for New Jersey was applied to the entire country. He believed each state should give up their individualism and become a greater part of these United States – the beginnings of destruction for America’s Constitution.

Meanwhile, behind the scenes a political grassroots effort was being put into place to over throw the government and take control, slowly and methodically. The father of the term “New World Order” systematically created the Federal Reserve as a private organization, institution of a forced income tax as a regular way to raise funds for government use and let’s not forget his creation of the Federal Trade Commission to ensure they could control every aspect of domestic and international trade of goods. .

Meanwhile, he gave the order to send troops to Latin America between 1914 and 1918 to overthrow Mexico, Haiti, Cuba, Panama and Nicaragua. In Nicaragua he personally selected the replacement of a new President to force the passage of the Bryan-Chamorro Treaty. In Haiti, he controlled the election to ensure his hand picked President was elected, whereby controlling the interests of the country. He also ordered troops to enter the Dominican Republic. While negotiating a treaty with Columbia he was apologizing for America’s role in the Panama Revolution in which Teddy Roosevelt was involved in during 1903-1904. This was the first time a sitting President ever apologized for another Presidents action while in the White House to a foreign country. This was a strike against Roosevelt for his acts in Latin America during his presidency.

Wilson was a coward! As American allies died throughout Europe during World War I, he refused to get involved. It wasn’t until after his reelection in 1916, he was forced to engage after being told German ships and submarines were attacking British Passenger Liners carrying American Passengers in the Atlantic Ocean.

During the middle of his second administration he openly welcomed socialists who supported the war efforts, but covered his six by creating the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. All the while he was creating his League of Nations and in 1920, still suffering from his stroke; he sent a request to Congress to vote in favor of the League of Nations to take over America. Congress voted against it. This wasn’t just his idea; it was the conception of a large group of individuals within his circle who wanted to control everything, including the United States of America. At the same time he was lobbying for the League of Nations,

This writer was surprised to learn that former Senator of New York and former Secretary of War, Elihu Root who was the Chairman of the Republican Party in 1912 was the spearhead of the Progressive Movement. After researching Mr. Root’s background it’s clear he was turned somewhere along his career. As a Diplomat for the Wilson Administration in 1917, he was sent to Russia and was instrumental in convincing them to stay in the war, even though he was sent there to talk peace. FDR also a Progressive Democrat became Secretary of War under Wilson.

Seven years after Wilson left the White House, those who were part of the progressive movement joined forces with the Democratic Party. Each of these people had communist leanings although on the surface they appeared to be patriotic Americans.

Since 1928, politics had taken on a whole new role for the Communist Party in how they dictated domestic and international policies.

FDR was another progressive who helped change the American Dream by creating program after program to dominate the American people. He created and orchestrated the New Deal Coalition whereby helping to form labor unions, corporate machines, which ultimately created a welfare state of mind among ethnic groups. Although he was on the surface a patriot, quietly he used his powers to transform the failed League of Nations into what’s now known as the United Nations. FDR was responsible for the Bretton Woods System which was the corner stone to what is now known as the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Together with the IMF the creation of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) was created, both of which are now part of the World Bank Group. All these organizations became operational in 1945. Although the objective of the Bretton Woods System obligated each country involved to adopt a join monetary policy to maintain the exchange rate system world wide by using the U.S. dollar as its base, it gave way to much power to the IMF to bridge any balance shortfalls. FDR’s New Deal Act and the creation of the Bretton Woods System were each based on the Keynesian economics.

The Keynesian Economic Theory was created by John Maynard Keynes in the 1920’s. Keynes authored a book called "The Theory of Money and the Foreign Exchanges” wherein he states. “Active government policy could be effective in managing the economy. Rather than seeing an unbalanced government budget as wrong, he believed that “countercyclical fiscal policies’, were a sure bet. Anyone in business knows you can’t spend what you don’t have, however, reinvesting in your company by tightening the purse strings is good business practices. Keynes believed in “deficit spending when a nation's economy suffers from recession or when recovery is long-delayed and unemployment is persistently high—and the suppression of inflation in boom times by either increasing taxes or cutting back on government outlays”. His approach works on paper, but it’s nothing more than a band-aid approach to a fiscal problem. This has been the approach of the Federal Government and other countries for the last sixty years. Keynes says it best “"in the long run, we are all dead." In other words, put a band-aid on the problem now because by the time they figure it out, we will be gone. As is evidenced by the last sixties years, the Keynesian theory of Economics has failed miserably.

Another Progressive (Richard Nixon) unilaterally terminated the United States ability to convert dollars to gold when he signed an Executive Order announcing the U.S. will no longer back its currency with gold, declaring "[t]he Bretton Woods system officially ended and the dollar became fully 'fiat currency,' backed by nothing but the promise of the federal government." This has been dubbed the Nixon shock. This decision left the U.S. Currency vulnerable and at the mercy of the Federal Reserve.

Each of these individual actions were progressive movement decisions, each strategically planned and executed by those within the Communist Party. Those involved helped impact the world stage by furthering the New World Order agenda of the Communist Party without realizing it.

Its no wonder why in the 1950’s when McCarthy began his Un-American investigations everyone in Washington, DC and across the country was in a panic. According to historical records McCarthy had a long list of suspected Communists who had infiltrated the State Department; the War Department later renamed Department of Defense, Dept of Commerce, Labor Department, staffers in the White House and even a few within Congress and Senate. He also had a long list of Union Bosses who were Communist Sympathizers. With so many already in positions of power, one has to wonder if McCarthy wasn’t strategically taken out of the great game, would he have been successful in his attempt to clean up Washington, DC? What would have happened if he was able to charge these people with treason or subversion; would we have the problems we have in today’s political climate? We will never know.

In today’s political arena one has to wonder if those involved in the Progressive movement even realize how they have been used as pawns to perpetuate the Communist agenda set in motion during the 1912 election. Many in elected office today use the same type of propaganda machine that helped get Wilson and the others elected, yet they just don’t give a damn because it’s not about America, it’s all about their next election and not about upholding the United States Constitution.

The ideology of the Communist Progressive movement is what enticed Pablo Picasso to use his talents as an artist to incorporate propaganda into his art. Picasso wasn’t a great artist, but he was easily persuaded because of his ego into using a talent God gave him for evil.


NEXT: "Picasso - The Art of War" Part 10: Art and Culture, a World Apart



"Picasso - The Art of War" is a series written & copyrighted to Author Elizabeth Kilbride 2011

All information contained within this series will be used in a book entitled “Picasso – The Art of War” all rights reserved and copyrighted to Elizabeth Kilbride. Permission is not granted to anyone for the copying or distribution of this information in print or media without the express permission of the author. This copyright is under both U.S.A and International Copyright Laws.

"Picasso - The Art of War" Part 8: Creating a Puppet President - Obama

Picasso's new version of the Dove of Peace Circa 1962

While researching Picasso for this series, I was astounded to learn Picasso was Barak Obama’s favorite artist. When we look at the list of people Obama claims to admire, Lincoln, FDR, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, John Coltrane, and Picasso; Picasso just didn’t fit. It is because of his admiration for Picasso that I started looking into the connection between the two men and why Obama would admire a communist artist. It is, for this reason, I began looking into the background of Obama and the whole birth certificate issue to find a connection between him and the Communist Party. Could it be that Obama was sending a clear message to those in the Communist Party - I’m with you in your cause?

Is it a coincidence that his half-sister was named Maya? No, because his mother was a staunch Communist supporter and follower of Picasso’s artwork and Picasso’s oldest daughter’s name is Maya..

After finding the connection between Obama and his family history with the Communist Party, I began to get curious about the debate over President Obama’s birth certificate. It’s ironic that those who have been researching this piece of paper, have failed to see the most important key piece of research - not in where Obama was born, but instead how and why his birth was registered in Hawaii. The other question they should be asking is why he ran for elected office in Chicago, Illinois instead of Hawaii.

Obama has confirmed he was born in 1961, yet he refuses to say exactly where that birth occurred. Let’s look at the evidence and chain of events.

According to the Hawaiian Registry of Birth which was verified by the Hawaii Law Library, the legal registry of any birth didn’t have to be provided by a hospital or parent in 1961; in fact, it could be accomplished by a grandparent or relative. It has also been verified by both the Registry and Law Library that up until 1979, anyone could enter the Department of Health for Vital Statistics and register the birth of any child. It didn’t matter where they were born as long as the person registering the child was a citizen of Hawaii. In 1979 these rules changed. If a child was born in Hawaii then the child would be listed as born on what Island and in what hospital. If the child was born in a foreign country it was listed accordingly. Therefore, in 1961 a registry of birth was filed in Hawaii for a boy child born to Ann Dunham but that birth was not registered by Ann herself, rather it was accomplished by her mother, Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham. In 1970 Obama’s half-sister Maya Soetoro was born in Jakarta, Indonesia and within a few days of her birth, Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham registered her birth with the registrar’s office in Hawaii too. She could do this in both cases because she was a resident of Hawaii. One must remember, Hawaii had only been a state under the United States of America for less than two years and their registry of birth procedures was still under the old system. It was not until 1977 when the U.S. Vital Statistics office began to change procedures and those changes included registry of foreign birth instead of live birth within the new state of Hawaii. Those changes took effect in 1979. Accordingly, any registry of Obama’s birth in the state of Hawaii in 1961 was the direct action of Madelyn Dunham not any doctor that was registered to practice medicine within the state, nor any hospital employee. Although Stanley and Madelyn had many friends throughout the Hawaiian Islands they could call upon to help in accomplishing this mission.

While living in Indonesia as a child, Obama was schooled as a British Citizen, under a British Passport. He was schooled in the Muslim faith by the highest Imam of the community. In the Islamic community, once you are a Muslim you can never denounce your faith in Allah, even though he claims to be a Christian – you can’t be both in the Islamic community.

So if he was under a British Passport how could he be a citizen of the United States? Coming from a low-income family as he claims, how could he have afforded to go to college at Occidental College in California, Columbia University in New York, and Harvard University in Boston?

While the country goes into a frenzy over whether Obama is truly a United States Citizen, all one has to do is look at the facts to answer these puzzling questions.

Let’s start with his grandparents. One major question to be asked is who was Stanley Dunham and his wife Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham. Although Stanley served in the Army during WWII and Madelyn worked in a bank, they didn’t move to Hawaii for the sun, sand, and surf, instead, they moved there in the fifties because they wanted to leave the United States of America to be among their own kind – other members of the Communist Party. Their entire circle of friends was all displaced Communists who left the United States to ensure they wouldn’t be caught up in the McCarthy investigations during the fifties.

One of their closest allies in the Communist movement was Frank Marshall Davis, a journalist, poet and Communist supporter who moved to Hawaii from Chicago in 1948 on the advice of Paul Robeson, another known Communist sympathizer. Hawaii during this time was going through a major change politically and socially. They were experiencing a non-violent revolution between colored labor workers and the white elite known as the Democratic Revolution. As an instigator for the labor movement spreading across the country, Davis was excited to meet Harry Bridges, an Australian-American who was a known Communist Party member. Davis began helping Bridges organize workers along the docks and encouraged them to get involved with the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) headed up by Bridges.

Throughout the 40s, while living in Chicago Davis denounced the Communist Party in public, but quietly helped them through the publication of his articles by including certain propaganda phrases. Through mutual friends at the Abraham Lincoln School in Chicago, he was introduced to Saul Alinsky during one of his community organizing events in the south side of Chicago, and soon after Davis began supporting Alinsky’s efforts.

As a member of the Civil Rights Congress and a teacher of Jazz at the Abraham Lincoln School, he used his position to help spread the word about Alinsky’s programs whereby promoting his socialistic ideology. The Civil Rights Congress run by William Patterson was later found to be a Communist propaganda front. Patterson was also the head of the Abraham Lincoln School in Chicago.

It was Davis who mapped out Obama’s career and school path even before Obama left Hawaii for the mainland. Through Frank Davis’s connections in California through the ILWU, Obama left Hawaii in 1979 for Occidental College, using his British Passport to register as a foreign student, thereby allowing him to receive U.S. federal government grants for his education. But I thought he was an American Citizen you might ask? Wait it gets better let's look at his entire career until now.

In 1981 he traveled to Indonesia, India, and Pakistan under the opus of visiting his mother and school friends. Upon returning to the United States he transferred from Occidental College to Columbia University in New York. After graduating from Columbia, he worked for a company called Business International Corporation, a known CIA front Company. After leaving BIC he went to work for New York Public Institute Research Group also in New York.

It was a known fact that during the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s infiltration of top government agencies, academic universities, and the cultural arts community by the Communist Party was being investigated by not only McCarthy’s Un-American Activities Committee but also the FBI. Unfortunately, McCarthy’s efforts to thwart the rise of socialistic infiltration were halted because of Roy Cohn’s attempt to subvert the United States Army hearing with a doctored photograph. Was this a covert sabotage of the investigation or just a stupid mistake?

1985 he moves to Chicago Illinois – why would a man who lives in Hawaii want to move to the cold windy city of Chicago? There is a very important reason why he decided on Chicago. Let’s look at the facts and the connections to the Communist Party throughout his career in Chicago.

From 1985-1988 Obama worked for the Developing Communities Project in Chicago; an Alinsky ideology group. During this same time period, he also worked with the Gamelial Foundation (founded in 1968 based on the principles of Alinsky which were actually Karl Marx's principles and ideologies) which was supported by the PICO National Network out of Oakland California, another Alinsky ideology group. He also worked for the Woods Fund of Chicago as a member of their Board of Directors (1994-2002 alongside his friend and colleague Bill Ayers a known communist sympathizer who is a staunch supporter of the anti-war and peace movement), He was on the board of the Joyce Foundation and Chicago Annenberg Challenge (the planned restructuring of our school system to help indoctrinate our children).

During 1988 he also traveled to Europe for three weeks, then on to Kenya for another five weeks. He’s never explained nor described where he went or who he met during this timeframe. Upon his return from his travels, he entered Harvard University and returned to Chicago during breaks to continue his work for his many community organizing groups. He also worked for Hopkins and Sutter who just so happened to be on the board of directors of the Gamaliel Foundation. One of the attorneys who worked for Skinner became the Chief of Staff for George H.W. Bush during his presidency.

Between the years of 1994-2008, Obama worked for Project Vote which was to coordinate unregistered voters throughout Illinois to ensure voter registration. The main group to coordinate this project was none other than ACORN. It was in 2002 that Obama allowed his law license to lapse, claiming an oversight in paperwork, but in reality, it was because he had unpaid parking tickets from his Harvard University days. This later piece of evidence is a breach of the Cannon Rules of being a lawyer.

Now let’s look at his political career. He was elected to the Illinois State Senate in 2004 and was endorsed by every union in the area. His constituents were all from the South Side of Chicago. The South Side of Chicago is the very area in which Alinsky and the Communist Party created their community organizing organizations to create their plan of the eventual takeover of America by using the people of the community as their ultimate pawns for success.

During the presidential campaign, Obama was seen on many occasions never placing his hand over his heart while the American National Anthem was played. He couldn’t because that would go against everything he was brought up to believe in – the Communist Manifesto. One must remember that his mother, grandparents, and family friends were all Communist sympathizers to the cause.

Throughout his campaign for President, he received endorsements from academia 40, Nobel Peace Prize winners 69, Unions 36, Newspapers 125, current and former president/vice presidents 2/2, current and former US Senators 48/18, current and former Congressional Reps 196/20, current and former Governors 17/22, but the kicker is the list of Foreign Endorsements 20 which include 19 socialist party members. Since the 2008 election evidence has surfaced that the majority of our elected officials in Washington DC who represent the Democratic Party have admitted to being socialist sympathizers or who have accepted money from the Communist Party. Each of these representatives is on the list of Endorsements for Barak Obama which only goes to show you how much the United States of America has been infiltrated by the Communist Party. The majority of the Nobel Prize winners who endorsed him are also connected to the Communist Party. There is no wonder why the famed Nobel Prize organization felt compelled to award Obama the Nobel Peace Prize when he didn't do anything to deserve it after taking office in Washington, DC.

His words and actions since taking the office of President have spoken for him. The first action against the American government was when he took the oath of office, he purposefully screwed up the oath so as to appear as though he was saying it properly, but in fact, he could not bring himself to swear an oath to protect and defend the United States Constitution. There has never been any video produced whereby showing the American people he properly took the oath, therefore, he doesn’t have to defend the Constitution and the laws of America. This was all part of the plan by people like Pablo Picasso and the Communist Party – subvert the American political system and control America. Picasso himself dreamed about this vision, which is why he gifted the Chicago Picasso to the City of Chicago. He was clearly sending a message to his comrades, one day your prince will take over America from the very city this statue stands. This is the reason why I chose the Picasso artwork you see above - it clearly shows his Dove stomping on the very symbols of freedom.

Throughout my investigation it is apparent Barak Hussein Obama is clearly a Communist Sympathizer, and has systematically infiltrated and subverted the power of the United States Political system and it’s Government which makes him a threat to the national security of America.

NEXT: "Picasso - The Art of War": Part 9 - Political TakeOver

"Picasso - The Art of War" is a series written & copyrighted to Author Elizabeth Kilbride 2011

All information contained within this series will be used in a book entitled “Picasso – The Art of War” all rights reserved and copyrighted to Elizabeth Kilbride. Permission is not granted to anyone for the copying or distribution of this information in print or media without the express permission of the author. This copyright is under both U.S.A and International Copyright Laws.

"Picasso - The Art of War" Part 7: Counter Culture & the Vietnam War - The Promised Utopia

Picasso envisioned a world as beautiful as Utopia. Only difference is, his Utopia was in dominating the world for the Communist cause and its evil purpose. This can be easily understood in many ways; not just through their propaganda campaign. Look around you and you’ll see their attempts at destroying America, England and Europe over the last forty years.

Transformation Scene from the movie "Avatar"

In order for my readers to understand what Picasso’s intent was in creating his own Utopia, one must watch the movie “Avatar” because within this movie his dream comes true. This movie is about a warrior shaman (much like Picasso) as he does not himself physically engage, but does so through mystical (shown in the movie as scientific) means. When he turns against his own, it’s because he has identified with and becomes the enemy.

“Avatar” is life imitating art because the man in the wheelchair represents non other than Ron Kovac of the famed movie 4th of July. During the 70’s this decorated Marine joined the ranks of the peace movement and turned his back on his country. He lost his values, his convictions and all he once held dear as a Marine. Brainwashed by the drug induced crowd, he believed the Utopia, Picasso and the Communist Party was trying to achieve was the answer to the future of America.



Marlon Brando's Character Colonel Kurtz,
in Apocalypse Now



Avatar Warrors


This movie shows how easy it is for those sent in to infiltrate the enemy can be turned to their cause. One line in the movie struck a cord because it is being used today, “Winning the Hearts and Minds of the enemy”- does this phrase sound familiar to any of my readers? This is the same thing depicted in Marlin Brando’s character in “Apocalypse Now”. Marlin Brando's character Col Kurtz is in fact leading a rouge force that is ruthlessly attacking the VC and NVA using some of the same methods of the VC and NVA, except even more extreme. As the Special Forces Officer that he is, he leads an indigenous force against the enemies of the US and S VN but as shear indiscriminate barbaric killers, and then refuses to report or accept orders to stand down as to disengage and come in. He is in fact something of an ultimate warrior, but also an insane war criminal that is no longer a soldier. As in “Apocalypse Now”, the turncoat becomes the leader of the enemy, as in mythology with symbolism that depicts the Shaman priest - Mind manipulator over the people.

After World War II, this was the intent of Picasso and his fellow Comrades - regroup, rebuild and reinforce their new army – using their form of arrows, horses, banshees and brut force. When they attack it will be with brut force and they will be ruthless in their destruction, until they have completely dominated America and the world. If you notice in the movie, the “Protectors” are large and fierce, protecting the enemy in the beginning and at the end. This represents those in the corporate world who are protecting those within the Communist Party today.

“Avatar” storyline is a clear and present danger to the free world, if Picasso was alive today; he would call this movie his UTOPIA!

In the Attributed Unknown Picasso art work the woman's right arm has been cut off on purpose. If you were to aquate this woman to the statue of Liberty, the right arm holds the torch of light for freedom. Therefore, the loss of freedom when discussing freedom of speech, one can easily see how the media the very essense of freedom of speech depicted in Benjamen Franklin's own words, "Without Freedom of Thought there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as Public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech." writing as Silence Dogood, No. 8, July 9, 1722.  Throughout the sixties we witnessed propaganda being carefully inserted into newspapers, radio and television promoting drug induced flower children slurring their words of peace, promise of Shangri-La or Utopia. Lack of understanding throughout the media world, that they had been infiltrated by the Communist or Socialist agenda, produced a viable weapon for the enemy on the ground in Vietnam. Phrases such as "Unwinnable War" uttered by Walter Cronkite,  and a multitude articles that caused more damage to American Miltiary forces such as journalists such as Peter Arnett who wrote "Death of Supply Column 21"that was filled with words of hatred towards those fighting for their lives in the jungles and rice fields of hell. These quotes were used in other publications such as the New Republic, New York Times, and newspapers across the nation that helped destroy the nation and its support for our military in the midst of war.


This movie along with other movies produced  since the 1960's have been an insult to every member of our military forces, who fought bravely and in many instances gave their lives for freedom. Movies such as this and Apocalopyse Now are an insult to Freedom, Liberty and individual rights and prosperity. Is this movie a call to arms to the flower children of the world? You’re damn straight it is and unless we the people stand and fight, they will win in their objective of complete and utter domination of all freedom throughout the world.

For those in Hollywood who grew up during the sixties and was spoon fed information by the Socialist Network system of KGB, GRU infiltrators through the finely tuned and orchestrated peace movement, you have been brainwashed to spread more and more propaganda through your artistic endeavors. As the Chicago Picasso statue clearly showed a pawn being dominated by a Trojan horse; you have clearly proven my theory of the great game played out by Picasso and his fellow Comrades. You’ve been their most ardent pawn of all for the last forty years.

In the current situation throughout America, England and Europe, the Communist Party’s final phase is taking place right before your very eyes - one country at a time. This is their final moment; they’ve been able to overthrow governments with propaganda, violence and terrorism - their own version of the Ride of the Valkyria. They’ve taken over businesses from the top, in order to control and destroy the world’s economy. They’ve planted the seeds of indoctrination whereby forcing everyone to submit to their tactics with fear and control.

Throughout the world they have achieved their goal of taking over countries by corrupting the media with their political correctness. By the way, Political Correctness is a standard throughout the Communist way of life, just look at history where the media was controlled in what they could and couldn’t say. What books they could read and how people interacted with each other. In America, we are seeing the same thing, but this time its not just in our business community, or our media, it’s within our own government – starting with those who got their start in politics from the very city in which Picasso planted his seed of “Hope” for his Utopia – Chicago. This wasn’t a coincidence readers, this was their signal to begin the transformation of the world.

For those countries who believe that interaction with the Muslim world community is a good thing, you should think again before believing they are willing to work with you and your government. The majority of those countries are under a communistic type belief system.

The world needs to wake up and realize they’ve been duped into believing their way of life has changed because of stupid decisions; it has not, it has been planned since the fall of the Communist Party in Germany, 1945. Picasso was only one who was duped into believing their way was the best way for the world. Most people in the art world don’t realize how many of Picasso’s artwork hangs in homes and government buildings throughout China. They too wish for his dream of Utopia, because his dream is their dream. We the people of America are now in debt to China, thanks to those who have lead us into destruction and slavery. Now we must suffer at the threat of their taking over America because of politician’s who have sold themselves to the Communist Party for those campaign donations.

Throughout the educational system around the world, history books are already being rewritten to eliminate certain facts and replace them with a new belief system; whereby giving credit to certain cultures for accomplishments they never earned.

Picasso’s Utopia has begun; I just hope he’s happy from the depths of hell for helping to destroy the free world and all it holds dear.

NEXT: "Picasso - The Art of War" Part 8: Creating a Puppet President - Obama

"Picasso - The Art of War" is a series written & copyrighted to Author Elizabeth Kilbride 2011

All information contained within this series will be used in a book entitled “Picasso – The Art of War” all rights reserved and copyrighted to Elizabeth Kilbride. Permission is not granted to anyone for the copying or distribution of this information in print or media without the express permission of the author. This copyright is under both U.S.A and International Copyright Laws.